Legal Opinion
Dakota Pork Industries v. City of Huron
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 2, 2002No. NonePublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GORS, Acting Justice.
[¶ 1.] Dakota Pork Industries (Dakota Pork) appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the City of Huron (City) on breach of express warranty and breach of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[¶ 2.] Dakota Pork operated a pork processing plant in Huron, South Dakota, from 1987 until it ceased operations in July of 1997. In 1991, Dakota Pork entered into an agreement with the City whereby City would provide for Dakota Pork’s water needs in exchange for Dakota Pork’s water rights in the James River. Negotiations…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gall v. Allegheny County Health DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Canavan v. . City of MechanicvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Kimball Investment Land, Ltd. v. ChmelaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Zepp v. Mayor & Council of AthensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Coast Laundry, Inc. v. Lincoln CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kuehl v. Horner (J.W.) Lumber Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Swedlund v. FosterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- James River Equipment Co. v. Beadle County Equipment, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Williams v. MaulisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Adel v. Greensprings of Vermont, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.