Legal Opinion

Coast Laundry, Inc. v. Lincoln City

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 15, 1972No. 29882PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Plaintiff brought action to recover damages to its laundry business allegedly sustained because the water supplied plaintiff by defendant city contained particles of tar.

The action was brought in successive counts upon alternative theories of negligence, breach of contract, strict liability, breach of express warranty and breach of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose. The trial judge withdrew from the jury all issues except that of negligence. The jury returned a verdict for defendant.

Plaintiff appeals assigning as error the action of the trial judge in withdrawing from the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Esberg Cigar Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Gardiner v. Philadelphia Gas WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Twohy Bros. v. Ochoco Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Canavan v. . City of MechanicvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Buckeye Union Fire Insurance v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mattoon v. City of PittsfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  2. Zepp v. Mayor & Council of AthensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Moody v. City of GalvestonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Gall v. Allegheny County Health DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Dakota Pork Industries v. City of HuronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API