Legal Opinion
United States v. Bolding
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 14, 1988No. Crim. JFM-87-0540PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Defendant, Ellis Edwin Bolding, has pled guilty to a criminal information charging him with having escaped from federal custody from November 1, 1987 through November 20, 1987. Because Bolding’s offense was committed after November 1, 1987, the sentencing guidelines promulgated by the United States Sentencing Commission under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 are here applicable. Bolding has filed a motion seeking to have the Sentencing Reform Act declared unconstitutional. The issues have been fully briefed, and on April 1, 1988, oral argument was held before six of the Judges of this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- United States v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- United States v. William Brainer, Eugene Gressman, Esq., Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. Jose Javier Fernandez and Jorge Cole, Appeal of Jose Javier FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Levelt Francois, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Jorge VizcainoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. BrittmanDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1988
- United States v. BelgardDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.