Legal Opinion

Cone v. Eubanks

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 17, 1928No. 6725PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

1. Where a judgment was attacked on the ground that the defendant was a non-resident of the State at the date of suit, and that the only return of service was by leaving a copy “at his most notorious place of abode” in the county where the suit was brought, and that the judge rendering the judgment was not legally qualified to do so, affidavit of illegality would lie. Planters Bank v. Berry, 91 Ga. 264 (18 S. E. 137); McKnight v. Wilson, 158 Ga. 160 (3) (122 S. E. 702); Bedingfield v. First National Bank, 4 Ga. App. 197 (61 S. E. 30). In these circumstances the petitioner had an adequate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Planters Loan & Savings Bank v. BerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. McKnight v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. Bedingfield v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Williamson v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  5. Williams v. HinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grimmett v. BarnwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  2. Bussell v. GlennSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API