Planters Loan & Savings Bank v. Berry
Supreme Court of Georgia
Before Judge Eve. City court of Richmond county.. May term, 1892. In connection with the facts stated in the opinion,, see National Park Bank v. Berry, 89 Ga. 333.
1Opinion of the Court
Bleckley, Chief Justice.
IIow the statutes of the United States stand at the present time on the subject of protecting national banks against the seizure of their effects by virtue of attachments in advance of final judgment, may be seen by reference to U. S. Rev. Stat., §5242. The only words-necessary to be how quoted are these : “And no attachment, injunction or execution, shall be issued againstsueh association or its property before final judgment-*265in any suit, action or proceeding, in any State, county, or municipal court.” The opinion, whether professional or judicial, which construes…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pacific National Bank v. MixterSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Bruce v. ConyersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- Raynor v. . Pacific National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
3Cited by24 opinions
- Third Nat. Bank in Nashville v. Impac Limited, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Harry Lemaire, Estate of Richard Patton, Hilmar R. Zeissig, Bert F. Scales, and Dieter J. Scherfenberg v. Mbank Abilene, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Pless & SladeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Bates v. BigbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Bedingfield v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.