Legal Opinion
In re Best Buy Co.
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided August 16, 2011No. MDL Nos. 2256, 2259, 2260, 2267, 2268PublishedCited by 117 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING TRANSFER
JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.
Before the Panel:* The Panel is presented with five motions for centralization of actions involving the California Song-Beverly Credit Card Act (the Song-Beverly Act). The actions before the Panel stem from the recent California Supreme Court ruling in Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma Stores that “personal identification information, as that term is used in [the Song-Beverly Act], includes a cardholder’s ZIP code.” 51 Cal.4th 524, 120 Cal.Rptr.3d *1377531, 246 P.3d 612 (Cal.2011). That ruling triggered the filing of the more than twenty actions…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re Transocean Ltd. Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
- In Re Gaiam, Inc., Water Bottle Mrktg., SalesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
3Cited by117 opinions
- In re Hudson's Bay Co. Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2018
- In re [24]7.Ai, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2018
- In re Gerber Probiotic Products Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
- In re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation (No. II)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2016
- Bartolucci v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.