Legal Opinion

In re [24]7.Ai, Inc.

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided October 3, 2018No. MDL No. 2863PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SARAH S. VANCE, Chair

Before the Panel:* Plaintiffs in the Northern District of California Ford action move under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize pretrial proceedings in this litigation in the Northern District of California. This litigation consists of three actions pending in the Central District of California, the Northern District of California, and the Northern District of Georgia, as listed on Schedule A. In addition, the parties have notified the Panel of one potential tag-along action, which was recently filed in the Northern District of California.

Plaintiff in the McGarry action…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Eli Lilly & Co.(cephalexin Monohydrate)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
  2. In re Best Buy Co.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
  3. In Re Transocean Ltd. Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
  4. In re Gerber Probiotic Products Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. A.A. v. PowerSchool Holdings, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
  2. A.A. v. PowerSchool Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2025
  3. Arede v. PowerSchool Holdings, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. Arede v. PowerSchool Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2025
  5. Baker v. PowerSchool Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2025

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API