Legal Opinion
Bartolucci v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 28, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2017-0117PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Daniel Bartolucci and Edward Ungvarsky sued defendant 1-800 Contacts, Inc. (“1-800 Contacts”), alleging that it agreed, and conspired to agree, with other online retailers selling contact lenses nationwide to restrain trade in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act and the District of Columbia’s consumer protection laws. Compl. ¶¶2, 5 [No. l:17-cv-00097, Dkt. # 1] (“Bartolucci Compl.”). Plaintiff Elizabeth Henry filed a separate lawsuit against 1-800 Contacts, as well as Vision Direct, Inc. (“Vision…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Continental Grain Co. v. Barge FBL-585Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gray v. HireRight, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2019
- In re: Toyota Hybrid Brake LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2020
- Kinsella v. Bureau of Ocean Energy ManagementDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Relman, Dane & Colfax Pllc v. Fair Housing Council of San Fernando ValleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Relman, Dane & Colfax Pllc v. Fair Housing Council of San Fernando ValleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.