United States Steel Corp. v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
*518OPINION and ORDER
LEVET, District Judge.
The plaintiff has moved for reargument of the court’s decisions stated in opinions dated July 1, 1969, 305 F.S.upp. 497; 305 F.Supp. 508.
I
Plaintiff maintains that the three basic conditions alleged in its complaint, namely (1) “low quality of coking coal and iron ore, resulting in loss of production;” (2) “abnormal cost-price relationships, resulting in the depression of Plaintiff’s business and earnings;” and (3) “numerous and protracted strikes, resulting in the interruption and diminution of Plaintiff’s normal production, output and operation;”…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Patricia Waldron, as of the Last Will and Testament of Gerald B. Waldron, Deceased v. Cities Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Granite Constr. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
- Amerigo Padovani v. Honorable Walter BruchhausenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Waldron v. British Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States Steel Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970