Legal Opinion

Ross v. Vaught

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 19, 1969No. 5-4913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Prank Hour, Justice.

This is an action to recover damages from a parent for his child’s negligent act. Appellee’s automobile was damaged in a collision with a vehicle owned by appellant and being driven by appelhint’s fourteen-year-old son. The complaint, as amended, alleged parental permission to drive the vehicle and that the negligence of appellant’s son is imputed to appellant by virtue of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 75-315 (c) (Supp. 1967).

The trial court sustained appellant’s demurrer to the complaint. On appeal from that order we reversed and remanded the case for trial. Vaught v. Ross, 244 Ark.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Skillern v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  2. Mullins v. Ritchie Grocer CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Ball v. HailSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  4. Bieker v. OwensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  5. Ford & Son Sanitary Co. v. RansomSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Continental Express v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Andrews v. SpringerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API