Legal Opinion

Federal Sugar Refining Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 19, 1925No. B-147PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCambbell, Chief Justice

The plaintiff sues to recover an alleged price for a large amount of sugar it furnished to the Navy. It claims that there was an agreed price of 23 cents per pound. After delivering the sugar it rendered a bill based on these figures, with an additional charge of 10 cents per bag and another small charge, all aggregating $97,356. The Government was credited with the payment made on the sugar at 14 cents per pound and a “discount” of $1,200. The difference of $37,356 is the principal sum claimed in the petition. The officials representing the Government in the transaction offered to settle for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. United States v. PfitschSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. United States v. Berdan Fire-Arms Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. United States v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johns-Manville Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  2. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926
  3. Foreign Trade Management Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
  4. Penn Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927
  5. California Packing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API