Legal Opinion
Octoraro Railway, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 24, 1984No. Appeal, No. 1987 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Doyle,
Petitioner, Octoraro Railway (Octoraro), appeals from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission) affirming an administrative law judge’s finding that he did not have the power to rule on the validity of a lease agreement between Southeastern Pennsylvania Transit Authority (SEPTA) and Chester County (County), and a sublease agreement between the County and Petitioner.
On March 1, 1983, the administrative law judge (ALJ), after previously ordering the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (DOT) to replace the bridge carrying State Highway A150…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Prive v. M. W. Goodell Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- McAllister v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
3Cited by4 opinions
- Diamond Energy, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- AT&T v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Capital City Cab Service Inc. v. Susquehanna Area Regional Airport Authority, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County2004
- Diamond Energy, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995