Legal Opinion
Roddy v. Schmidt
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 9, 1982PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiffs-appellants seek to recover certain real and personal property, located in the State of Florida, which they transferred to defendants in payment of compensation for services rendered. Defendants were personally served in Florida, the State of their residence, and the Appellate Division granted their cross motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction (made in response to a motion by plaintiffs to compel an examination before trial).
In support of their assertion that…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Cooperstein v. Pan-Oceanic Marine, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Rohdie v. Michael Guidice, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Morse Typewriter Co. v. Samanda Office Communications Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Pappas v. ArfarasDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- N.A.S. Holdings, Inc. v. PafundiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004