Cooperstein v. Pan-Oceanic Marine, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
While Mutual did not sustain its burden of proof with respect to its allegation that New York is an inconvenient forum for the subject litigation (see, Islamic Republic v Pahlavi, 62 NY2d 474, cert denied 469 US 1108; Laurenzano v Goldman, 96 AD2d 852, 853), there is no basis upon which personal jurisdiction can be exercised over Mutual.
When determining whether a party transacts business in New York within the meaning of CPLR 302 (a) (1), the court must examine the party’s activities within the forum to see if purposeful acts have been performed in the State (see, Roddy v Schmidt, 57 NY2d…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Islamic Republic of Iran v. PahlaviNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Fantis Foods, Inc. v. Standard Importing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- George Reiner & Co. v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Baptichon v. Nevada State BankDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Worldwide Futgol Associates, Inc. v. Event Entertainment, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Nasso v. SeagalDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Catauro v. Goldome Bank for SavingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In Re DES CasesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.