Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Helm

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 21, 1912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Boyle Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Chief Justice Hobson

Reversing.

G. T. Helm was in the service of the Cincinnati, New Orleans & texas Pacific Railway Company as a detective, and his duties took him along the whole line of railway. •On April 3,1911, he was in Danville acting under special orders in making an examination of seals on freight box *341cars in the Danville yard. In discharging this duty, he went upon what is called the house track where eleven freight box cars were standing. One of the rules of the company required the foreman of the switching crew to give notice when the house track was to be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robards v. P. Bannon Sewer Pipe Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. HockerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  3. Age's Administrator v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Hay's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Johnson's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. Helm v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. Louisville N. R. Co. v. HouckCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API