Kempner v. Rosenthal
Texas Supreme Court
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY, Associate Justice.
A. Goldstein and G. Melasky were partners, conducting business under the firm name of Goldstein & Melasky. On the 4th day of August, 1887, the firm was insolvent and owed debts to both appellant and appellee. The title to the land in controversy was in the name of G. Melasky, who was then in Hew York, and had given to his partner Goldstein a power of attorney to “sell a tract of land consisting of 113 acres, in Cooke County, Texas, near Gaines-ville, known as the Hall land, in the old Peery addition, for such price and on such terms as to him shall seem meet,” etc.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cook v. TullisSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Taylor v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Wood v. McCainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
- Wallis, Landes & Co. v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by16 opinions
- Swain v. Wiley College, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
- Ferguson v. MansfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1924
- Williams Chastain v. LairdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Franke v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Lynch Davidson & Co. v. Denman Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.