Legal Opinion

Higley v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1930No. 4722PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEphraim Hanson, J.

Certiorari to review the action of the Industrial Commission of Utah in denying the petition of the dependents of Glen Higley, deceased, for compensation on account of his death. On May 20, 1927, Higley, an employee of the International Smelting Company, came to his death by the discharge of a 30-30 Winchester rifle. The commission found: (1) That “the injury which resulted in the death of the deceased” was not an accidental injury but was intentionally self-inflicted; and (2) that at the time the deceased sustained the injury which resulted in his death he had departed from the course of his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Von Ette's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Westman's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
  3. Hawkins v. Kronick Cleaning & Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. Moray v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Twin Peaks Canning Co. v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Park Utah Consolidated Mines Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Lipman v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Wherritt v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Thompson v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Dern Investment Co. v. Carbon County Land Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API