Thompson v. Industrial Commission
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFolland, J.
This is an original proceeding to review a decision of The Industrial Commission of Utah denying compensation. William F. Thompson, the plaintiff, was for about four years employed at the Hylton Flour Mills at Ogden as oiler and sweeper. His duties required him to oil and fumigate the machinery, clean and dust collectors, and sweep the floors of the mill. He alleges that on July 10, 1932, while shaking a dust collector, particles of dust entered his eye, caused an ulcer of the right eye to become perforated, resulting in almost total disability of that eye. After a hearing, the commission…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tintic Milling Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922
- Bingham Mines Co. v. AllsopUtah Supreme Court · 1921
- Los Angeles & S. L. R. Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1932
- Geo. A. Lowe Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1920
- Wilson Co., Inc. v. McGeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Columbia Steel Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1937
- Young v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1939
- Batchelor v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Crittenden v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1971