Utah Mercur Gold Min. Co. v. Herschel Gold Min. Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WOLFE, Chief Justice.
Demurrers to both the first and second causes of action of the second amended complaint in this case were sustained, the first on the ground that it did not state a cause of action; the second on the ground that the statute of frauds .applied. The plaintiff tired of pleading over, stood on his second amended complaint and a judgment of dismissal was entered. From the judgment of dismissal plaintiff appeals.
The complaint does not easily lend itself to analyzation. Penetrating its verbiage the situation as set out is substantially that plaintiff Mercer in 1934 went into…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Paul v. Layne & Bowler Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Genola Town v. Santaquin CityUtah Supreme Court · 1938
- Besse v. McHenryMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- Slusser v. AumockIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
- Kennedy v. Combined Metals Reduction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Thurston v. Box Elder CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- Ravarino v. PriceUtah Supreme Court · 1953
- SCM Land Co. v. Watkins & FaberUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re Madsen's Est.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
- Madsonia Realty Co. v. Zion's Savings Bank & Trust Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.