Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Combined Metals Reduction Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1935No. 5563PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EPHRAIM HANSON, Justice.

By their amended complaint the plaintiffs alleged, in substance, as follows: That the defendant is a corporation engaged in mining precious metals in Tooele county, Utah; that on or about July 10, 1929, defendant represented to plaintiff Kennedy and a Mr. Taylor that it was the owner of the mining claims known as the Frankie Ella and Little Alex in Tooele county and defendant was desirous of having these claims developed and mined on a royalty basis; that at said time an agreement was entered into between the defendant and said Kennedy and Taylor whereby the latter…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stoner v. ZuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Dark v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
  3. Beatty v. GregorySupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  4. Hosford v. MetcalfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  5. Yeager v. WoodruffUtah Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Patel v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  2. Utah Mercur Gold Min. Co. v. Herschel Gold Min. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Rushton v. Standard Industries, Inc. (In re C.W. Mining Co.)District Court, D. Utah · 2013
  4. Jubber v. Hiawatha Coal Proceeds (In re C.W. Mining Co. )United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2014
  5. Kelly v. Rainelle Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API