Legal Opinion

State v. Fettig

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 18, 1992No. 92-0881-CR, 92-0882-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnyder, J.

This is one of the first appellate cases arising under the criminal penalty provisions of Wisconsins Hazardous Waste Management Act (HWMA), secs. 144.60 to 144.74, Stats. A jury found Tankcraft Corporation and its president, Robert P. Fet-tig, guilty of wilfully storing and disposing of hazardous wastes without a license. Three issues are raised on appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred by instructing the jury that knowledge that a license is required need not be proved, (2) whether the state failed to prove that the stored toluene was "spent" so as to constitute a hazardous waste, and (3)…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. FreedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. State v. PoellingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. DyessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  2. State v. David J.K.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  3. Hannigan v. Sundby Pharmacy, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API