Legal Opinion
Hannigan v. Sundby Pharmacy, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided February 25, 1999No. 98-1673PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeininger, J.
Stephen Hannigan appeals an order granting summary judgment which dismissed his suit against Sundby Pharmacy. Hannigan alleges that Sundby Pharmacy violated § 146.83, Stats., by failing to provide him with a statement paraphrasing his rights to access his medical records and by failing to maintain proper information regarding requests for his medical records. Section 146.84(l)(b), Stats., provides for damages when such violations are committed "in a manner that is knowing and wilful." The trial court granted summary judgment for Sundby Pharmacy on the grounds that the violations were not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- M & I First National Bank v. Episcopal Homes Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Stockbridge School District v. Department of Public Instruction School District Boundary Appeal BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Anderson v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. PrestonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cruz v. All Saints Healthcare System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- Bowen v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
- Ortiz v. Aurora Health Care, Inc. (In Re Ortiz)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2012
- Bowen v. LABOR AND INDUSTRY REVIEW COM'NCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007