Legal Opinion

Bickel v. Saul

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided August 30, 2019No. 2:18-cv-01296Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN AMY BICKEL, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 18-CV-1296 ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER Amy Bickel seeks judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying her claim for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits and a Title XVI application for supplemental security income under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). For the reasons below, the Commissioner’s decision is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Donna J. Clifford v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  3. Jelinek v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Nancy Prochaska v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  5. Kip Yurt v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API