Legal Opinion
Nancy Prochaska v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 24, 2006No. 05-3218PublishedCited by 699 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
Nancy Prochaska appeals the denial of her application for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. She contends that the Administrative Law Judge’s ruling that she is not disabled was flawed for both procedural and substantive reasons. Because the ALJ failed to explore inconsistencies between the vocational expert’s testimony and the Dictionary of Occupational Titles, as required by Social Security Ruling 00-4p, we vacate and remand this case for further proceedings.
I. Background
Prochaska spent her last 13 years of employment working for two…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Donna J. Clifford v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Joyce A. Rutherford v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Hackett v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Joseph BURNS, Appellant v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- C. Etta Rice v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by699 opinions
- Craft v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Villano v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Linda Roddy v. Michael AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Cheryl Beardsley v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Eshagh Massachi v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
694 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.