Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Hungerford

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1923No. 22314PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.

This was an action upon a promissory note signed by the defendant, Hungerford, and payable to Joseph Acker. Plaintiff alleges that the note is past due and unpaid, and that he was a purchaser in good faith before maturity.

The answer of the defendant, Hungerford, is of the nature of a plea in abatement. In substance, it is to the effect that Hungerford is a real estate broker; that defendant Acker was the owner of a tract of land which he desired to sell; that Acker, desiring to remove from the state, conveyed the land to Hungerford as a nominal purchaser for the purpose of sale by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bradford Investment Co. v. JoostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Meehan v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Tucker v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  4. Grable v. BeattyNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dempsey v. LangtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Federal Farm Mortgage Corp. v. ThieleNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Baltimore Trust Co. v. OidickBaltimore City Superior Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API