Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 15, 1883PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to County Court of Jefferson County. The case is stated, in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHelm, J.

Upon a careful examination of the record before us, we conclude that there is but one error of sufficient importance to justify a reversal.

This is a proceeding by scire facias, under the old practice, to revive a judgment. After considerable preliminary skirmishing, defendant below filed four special pleas in bar of the action, viz.: Eirst, nul tiel record; second, actio non accrevit, three years; third, idem, seven years; and fourth, accord and satisfaction. That plaintiff agreed with defendant, that if defendant would journey with him from Boulder to Gilpin county, and pay all the expenses…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bradford Investment Co. v. JoostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Tynon v. DespainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  3. Hunt v. HaytSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  4. McLure v. KoenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  5. Ruth v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API