Tucker v. Edwards
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to County Court of Jefferson County. The case is stated, in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHelm, J.
Upon a careful examination of the record before us, we conclude that there is but one error of sufficient importance to justify a reversal.
This is a proceeding by scire facias, under the old practice, to revive a judgment. After considerable preliminary skirmishing, defendant below filed four special pleas in bar of the action, viz.: Eirst, nul tiel record; second, actio non accrevit, three years; third, idem, seven years; and fourth, accord and satisfaction. That plaintiff agreed with defendant, that if defendant would journey with him from Boulder to Gilpin county, and pay all the expenses…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Bradford Investment Co. v. JoostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Tynon v. DespainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
- Hunt v. HaytSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- McLure v. KoenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
- Ruth v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.