Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 1989No. F010773PublishedCited by 9 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, P. J.

Statement of the Case

Plaintiff, Jessica Rae Schmidt (petitioner), through her guardian ad litem, Deborah Wright, has asked this court to review the lawfulness of the trial court’s order denying her motion for summary adjudication of issues and partially granting real parties in interest’s (defendants’) motion for summary judgment.

Petitioner filed a complaint for personal injuries naming James A. West and Cynthia West as defendants. Defendants moved for summary judgment on the grounds “that no triable issue as to any material fact exists with respect to this action and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Rose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Blue Mountain Development Co. v. CarvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Cornell University Medical College v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Sturm, Ruger & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Seibert Security Services, Inc. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN BERNARDINO CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. People v. Superior Court (Brent)California Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. MinCal Consumer Law Group v. Carlsbad Police DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Kleefeld v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API