Seibert Security Services, Inc. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN BERNARDINO CTY.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DABNEY, Acting P. J.
Petitioner Seibert Security Services, Inc. (hereinafter Seibert), a defendant in the action below, seeks reversal of an order denying its motion for summary judgment and/or adjudication of issues. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c.) Seibert’s contention is that it established, as a matter of law, a complete defense in that plaintiff and real party in interest John Migailo’s action is barred by the so-called “fireman’s rule.” We issued an alternative writ to inquire into the correctness of the trial court’s ruling, and now conclude that petitioner is entitled to the relief…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. Eric J.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Davidson v. City of WestminsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Williams v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Vasquez v. North County Transit DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Calatayud v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Sepega v. DeLaura ConcurrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- City of Oceanside v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Justin LUND v. MILFORD HOSPITAL, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.