United States v. Gant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Michael Gant (“Gant”) appeals his 18-month prison sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release, alleging that the district court erred by failing to state its reasons, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2), for departing from the 3-9 month range provided in United States Sentencing Guideline § 7B1.4 and by considering impermissible factors in determining Gant’s sentence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e). We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
Because Gant did not raise the alleged sentencing errors in district court,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Amelia Barajas-MontielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. BlackieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. BlackieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. BlackieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. BlackieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008