Legal Opinion

United States v. Gant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 7, 2007No. 06-10237PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Michael Gant (“Gant”) appeals his 18-month prison sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release, alleging that the district court erred by failing to state its reasons, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2), for departing from the 3-9 month range provided in United States Sentencing Guideline § 7B1.4 and by considering impermissible factors in determining Gant’s sentence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e). We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

Because Gant did not raise the alleged sentencing errors in district court,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Amelia Barajas-MontielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. BlackieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. BlackieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. BlackieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. BlackieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API