Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

United States v. Blackie

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 21, 2008No. 07-2002Published

1Concurring in the judgmentSutton, Circuit Judge

I agree with the majority’s disposition of this appeal and with its reasoning in addressing each of the questions raised, save one: Did the district court fail to satisfy § 3553(c)(2)’s requirement that it state in open court and in the written judgment the reasons for selecting a sentence one month above the 41-month advisory guidelines range? I agree with the majority that the district court failed to satisfy this requirement, but I see no reason to decide whether that shortcoming amounts to plain error.

The government never asked us to apply plain-error review to this claim, which by itself…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Myrisa v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. FullerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. GantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Rolando Gonzalez-DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API