Legal Opinion
Munoz v. Florentine Gardens
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 20, 1991No. B050644PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J. --
Plaintiffs purport to appeal from an order dismissing their case for failure to prosecute or as a sanction for failing to appear at the court-scheduled status conference. Such an order is not a final judgment and is not an appealable order. (Code Civ. Proc., § SSld; 1 Rios v. Torvald Klaveness (1969) 2 Cal.App.3d 1077 [83 Cal.Rptr. 150]; Graski v. Clothier (1969) 273 Cal.App.2d 605 [78 Cal.Rptr. 447].)
At the request of the justices of this court, the clerk communicated with counsel to request letter briefs on the issues of whether there was a written order signed by the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bellah v. GreensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Cohen v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Minor v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Freedman v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Rios v. Torvald KlavenessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Walker v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re Matthew C.California Supreme Court · 1993
- Gitmed v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- In Re Marriage of MacFarlane & LangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Jordan v. MaloneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.