Legal Opinion

Litman v. Walso

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 19, 1941No. Nos. 32,922, 32,938PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Justice.

In an action to recover $3,432 for personal injuries and damage to plaintiff’s automobile resulting from a collision alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence, the latter counterclaimed for damage to his car in the sum of $200. Motions for directed verdicts were made by each party and denied. After verdict of $300 for plaintiff, defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial, and plaintiff moved for a new trial on the ground of inadequate damages. Both parties appeal from the order denying their respective motions.

The damage complained of resulted from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mohr v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. Craig v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  3. Pratt v. Pioneer Press Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  4. Kraus v. SaffertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  5. Fickling v. NassifSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Krueger v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. Schmitt v. EmerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. Berg v. UllevigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Maas v. Midway Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Olson v. ChristiansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API