Howard v. Arthur Murray, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Per Guriam.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order denying his motion to strike two affirmative defepses from defendants’ answer. The amended complaint alleges that plaintiff and his former wife conducted, as copartners, dancing schools and studios in Oklahoma, under the name of “ Arthur Murray School of Dancing ”, pursuant to franchise agreements entered into with the corporate defendant; that the partnership was dissolved by mutual agreement September 30, 1948, and that under the terms of said franchise agreements the copartnership was entitled, upon dissolution, to recover from the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jackson v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Keene v. ChambersNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Mastrofrancisco v. Mohawk Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- MacFarland v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1941
- Gray v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- St. Regis Tribe of Mohawk Indians v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1956
- Ruderman v. WeseleyCivil Court of the City of New York · 1995