Legal Opinion
MacFarland v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided September 12, 1941No. Claim No. 25154PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarrett, P. J.
This is a claim for damages caused by the overflow of the waters of Oneida lake, the State’s liability having been fixed in the case of Haskell v. State of New York (258 App. Div. 930; affd., 283 N. Y. 612). In the claim of Slocum v. State of New York (177 Misc. 114), wherein the property was owned by tenants in common, but the claim was filed by but one tenant, the motion by claimant to add the name of the other tenant as a party claimant was denied. Here the property was owned,by claimant and his wife as tenants by the entirety. The claim was filed by the husband and a motion made to amend…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Matter of Goodrich v. . Vil. of OtegoNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- De Puy v. . StrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
- Grosser v. . City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Scutella v. County Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Emmeluth v. . H.B. AssociationNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Panzica v. Cimino, New York County Courts1959
- Bleeck v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1945
- Howard v. Arthur Murray, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Barker v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1954
- Holmes v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.