Cranston v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Circuit Judge.
The appellant obtained a jury’s verdict in the court below for damages for personal injuries suffered by him through the alleged negligence of the defendant company in the operation of its railroad. On a question of law reserved, the court entered judgment for the defendant n. o. v. on .the ground that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. From that judgment the plaintiff has appealed.
Upon review of the entry of judgment for the defendant n. o. v., we, perforce, take the pertinent facts and all reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ely v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Thomas v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Kolich v. Monongahela Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Weiss v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Giffin v. EnsignCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Foresman v. PepinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Hornin v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Cunningham v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Downey v. Union Paving Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.