Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Flowers
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 2, 1978No. 328PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MANDERINO, Justice.
Appellant was charged as an accessory before the fact under the Penal Code of 1939, § 1105, as amended, 18 P.S. § 5105 (since repealed and replaced by the Crimes Code of 1973) for his alleged participation in the sale of marijuana in violation of the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act of 1972, § 13(a)(30), as amended, 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(30). He was convicted after a nonjury trial, and post-verdict motions challenging the sufficiency of the evidence were denied. The Superior Court affirmed the judgment of sentence, with Judge Spaeth…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. PeoniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- Commonwealth v. StrantzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Morei v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- United States v. Marie Moses, Alias Marie KellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MurphySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. SwerdlowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. MurphySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. VogelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth, Aplt v. Gross, E.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.