Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Murphy

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 2002PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, P.J.E.

¶ 1 Appellant, Ronald Murphy, appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed by the Trial Court after his conviction for delivery of a controlled substance (heroin) and conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance (heroin). 1 After review, we affirm.

¶ 2 The underlying facts of this case, which gave rise to Appellant’s conviction, have been gleaned from the trial record in this matter. The record reveals that on August 30, 2000 Pennsylvania State Trooper Timothy Longenecker went to an area in the City of York for the purposes of making a controlled purchase of heroin. N.T. Trial,…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. DiStefanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. HardcastleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. MelvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. MurphySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. LamondaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Commonwealth v. KnoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API