Weinstein v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Per curiam
The matter in controversy in these actions arises out of an indictment charging the' defendants with selling “a certain contrivance, or machine, designed and intended for use in the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor, to wit, one three-gallon still complete.”
*389The indictment is based primarily on section 18, title 2, of the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. at Large, p. 313), which reads as follows :
“See. 18. It shall be unlawful to advertise, manufacture, sell or possess for sale any utensil, contrivance, machine, preparation, compound, tablet, substance, formula, direction, or…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Delaware Accessories Trade Ass'n v. GebeleinDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- United States v. BrunettDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1931
- Record Revolution No. 6 v. City of Parma, OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
- Commonwealth v. CorbettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Jacobs v. DancigerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.