Legal Opinion
Altman v. Altman
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided March 5, 1999No. 96-485PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff Robert Altman appeals from a superior court order denying his VR.C.R 60(b) motion to set aside an earlier judgment dismissing his complaint against defendants Jonathan Altman, Carol S. Berry, and Putney Pasta Company. Plaintiff contends the court erred in: (1) failing to hold an evidentiary hearing; and (2) denying the motion. We affirm.
The material facts are largely undisputed. Plaintiff, a resident of New York City, is the father of defendant Jonathan Altman. Jonathan Altman is married to defendant Carol S. Berry, and both are officers of defendant Putney Pasta Company. In June…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bingham v. TenneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- R. Brown & Sons, Inc. v. International Harvester Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Richwagen v. RichwagenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Dougherty v. SurgenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
- Goshy v. MoreySupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sandgate School District v. CateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Olio v. OlioSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- In re Petition of Swanton Wind LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Aerie Point Holdings, LLC v. Vorsteveld Farm, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
- Murphy v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.