Legal Opinion
De Jonge v. Hunt
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 18, 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
Tbe following facts were found by tbe court:
“Tbe plaintiff resides in the city of Grand Eapids, Michigan, and tbe defendant resides in Sioux City, Iowa. February 3, 1893, tbe plaintiff received the following letter from tbe defendant, viz.:
“ ‘Friend, George:
‘“As I am disposing of all my property outside of Sioux City, Iowa, if you can net me $1,000 for my two lots and two and one-half acres, let them go, as I want to get rid of them, and clean up; you to get your commission above that amount. George, you ought to make $500 out of this deal. If not sold within 60 days, I will take it out of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Orr v. HodgsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Eggleston v. WagnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Sawyer v. BrossartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- North-Western Iron Co. v. MeadeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867
- Matteson v. ScofieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Coller v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Anderson v. StewartNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
- Rahm v. CummingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Knox v. McMurraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Foss Investment Co. v. AterWashington Supreme Court · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.