Legal Opinion

State, Department of Administration, Division of Retirement & Benefits v. Shea

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 2017No. 7166 S-15787PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINFREE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A state employee applied for occupational disability benefits, claiming that prolonged sitting at work aggravated a preexisting medical condition. The Division of Retirement and Benefits denied the claim. An administrative law judge affirmed that decision, determining that employment was not a substantial factor in causing the employee’s dis*527ability. On appeal the superior court reversed the administrative law judge’s decision. Because the administrative law judge’s decision was supported by substantial evidence, we reverse the superior court’s decision…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shea v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Retirement & BenefitsAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights v. Yellow CabAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Winschel v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Vincent Ex Rel. Staton v. Fairbanks Memorial HospitalAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Lopez v. Administrator, Public Employees' Retirement SystemAlaska Supreme Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Public Safety Employees Association v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Ross v. Alaska State Comm'n for Human RightsAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Harry Ross v. State of Alaska Human Rights CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Public Safety Employees Association v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API