Legal Opinion

In re Wheeler

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 8, 1936No. 3659PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary *1242Examiner rejecting claims 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8 in appellent’s application for a patent for an alleged invention relating to automatic filler feeds for cigar machines of “the type in which a layer of filler tobacco is automatically fed into a charge forming device.”

Claim 1 is sufficiently illustrative of appealed claims 1, 3, and 5. It reads:. (1) .In an automatic filler feed for cigar machines, the combination with a continuously rotating driving member, of a…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re BoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  2. Application of Abraham Joseph NutmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  3. Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  4. Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  5. Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API