Holmes v. Roe
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to superior court of Detroit. (Chipman, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion and head-notes.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
Plaintiff resided and did business as a general merchant at Chelsea, distant about fifty-five miles from Detroit, on the Michigan Central Railroad. He did his business with the Chelsea Savings Bank.
On the eighth day of August, 1885, at the stock-yards in ithat portion of the city of Detroit called Springwells, the plaintiff sold to, defendant a number of sheep, for $131.60, and received in payment defendant’s check on Yincent J. Scott’s Banking Office. Scott was a private banker, doing business in the city of Detroit. The parties differ as to what was said at the time the cheek was given.
The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burkhalter v. . the Second Nat. BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Griffin v. KempIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Simpson v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Woodruff v. PlantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
- Cawein v. BrowinskiCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1869
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lewis, Hubbard & Co. v. Montgomery Supply Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. KempMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- First National Bank v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Joppa v. Clark Commission Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Morris v. Eufaula National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.