Legal Opinion
Conrad v. Boiron, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 24, 2017No. 16-3656PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Chad Conrad filed a class action against Boiron for deceptive marketing, but he was left with only his individual claim after the district court refused to certify his proposed class. About a year later Boiron offered Conrad $5,025, more than he could hope to win at trial. Conrad does not want to accept the money because it will moot his claim; Boiron wants to force him to take it for the same reason. The district court refused to certify Conrad’s proposed class and found his individual claim moot. We conclude, in keeping with our decision in Fulton Dental, LLC v. Bisco,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Beaton v. Speedypc SoftwareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Andrea Santiago v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- Joshua Jarrett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Adair v. Town Of CiceroDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.