Legal Opinion

American Milling Co. v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 4, 1912PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Daviess Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the CouRt by

Chief Justice Hobson

Reversing.

*69The American Milling Company operates a mill at Owensboro in which, it uses a large quantity of cotton seed meal. A. J. Bell was a laborer in its employment in November, 1909, and had been for abont three years. The cotton seed meal was in bags of abont 100 ponnds weight and abont two feet long. These bags were stacked in ricks on one side of the room, where Bell worked. It was his duty to carry the bags from the ricks to the hopper and there nntie them. The meal was then ponred into the hopper by another man. While Bell was thns engaged a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith's Admr. v. North Jellico Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Big Hill Coal Co. v. Abney's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Louisville Water Co. v. DarnellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  2. Duvin Coal Company v. FikeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Interstate Coal Co. v. GarrardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Hunsaker's Admrx. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  5. Green's Administrator v. C. & O. Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API