Hunsaker's Admrx. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Boyd Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Thomas
Affirming.
James A. Hnnsaker was, and bad been for a long while, in tbe employ of the appellee and defendant be*687low, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, hereinafter referred to as the Railway Company, in its yards in Ash-land, Kentucky, in the. capacity of conductor of a switching crew. The Ashland Coal & Iron Railway Company (hereinafter referred to as the Ashland Company), .a Kentucky corporation, owned and operated some of the tracks in the yards in Ashland in which Hunsaker operated his .train, while the railway company owned other tracks in the same yards…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lee v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Illinois Central Ry. Co. v. Sheegog's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- Louisville & N. R. R. Co. v. Breeden's Adm'x.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Kelly's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Clinger's Admx. v. C. & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gibralter Coal Mining Co. v. NalleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Southern Railway Co. v. Kelly Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
- Raikes v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Johnson v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965
- Moody v. Consolidated Coach Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.