Legal Opinion

State v. Agnew

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 12, 1977No. 762SC894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Defendant contends that the trial court committed error when it failed to grant defendant’s motions to dismiss in each of the three cases at the conclusion of all the evidence. We agree with defendant and hold that the evidence was insufficient to survive the motions.

Defendant’s motions to dismiss, made at the close of all the evidence, draw into question the sufficiency of all the evidence to go to the jury. See State v. Hitt, 25 N.C. App. 216, 212 S.E. 2d 540 (1975).

Our Supreme Court has stated that:

“There must be substantial evidence of all material elements of the offense…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. State v. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. . ShipmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. State v. . CohoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. State v. LittleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API