Legal Opinion

McKenzie v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 3, 2012No. 11-933PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAREN R. BAKER, Justice.

| ,This case arose from an order of the St. Francis County Circuit Court denying appellant Cleo McKenzie’s motion to quash several subpoenas duces tecum issued to his health-care providers for his medical records and for Rule 11 sanctions. Because resolution of the issues presented involve an extraordinary writ, our jurisdiction is proper pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 1 — 2(a)(3) (2011). Because appellant has no other adequate remedy and because the proceedings are erroneous on the face of the record, we treat the appeal as a petition for a writ of certiorari…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. SypultSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Hanley v. Arkansas State Claims CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Arkansas Department of Human Services v. CollierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Jordan v. Circuit Court of Lee CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. MacKool v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  2. Lukach v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Berger v. KelleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  4. Wash. Reg'l Med. Ctr. v. Nw. Physicians, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  5. Tracy Will Vaughn v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API