Legal Opinion

Lukach v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 30, 2014No. CR-91-279PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

2014 Ark. 451

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS Nos. CR-91-279, CR-91-293 JOHN R. LUKACH Opinion Delivered October 30, 2014 PETITIONER PRO SE PETITION TO REINVEST V. JURISDICTION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT TO CONSIDER A PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERROR CORAM STATE OF ARKANSAS NOBIS, MOTION TO APPOINT RESPONDENT COUNSEL AND FOR HEARING, AND “MOTION FOR ORDER AND SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION” [HOT SPRING COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, NOS. 30CR-91-115, 30CR-91- 123, 30CR-91-124, 30CR-91-126] PETITION AND MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL AND FOR HEARING DENIED; MOTION FOR ORDER MOOT. PER CURIAM In 1991, petitioner John R. Lukach was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  2. Newman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Lukach v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Bates v. McNeilSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Grant v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ventress v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  2. Bean v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  3. John Richard Lukach v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
  4. Dodge v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  5. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API