Legal Opinion

Silbernagel v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 2, 1982PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION of the court

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order reversed, with costs, order of Supreme Court, Bronx County, reinstated and question certified answered in the negative (Pierson v City of New York, 56 NY2d 950).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer; Judges Fuchsberg and Meyer on constraint of Pierson v City of New York (56 NY2d 950). Taking no part: Judge Gabrielli.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pierson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hochberg v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Thomas v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. JVC Tavern Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Marabello v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984